Learning Theory
A. Content and language integrated learning
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) involves
teaching a curricular subject through the medium of a language other than that
normally used. The subject can be entirely unrelated to language learning, such
as history lessons being taught in English in a school in Spain. CLIL is
taking place and has been found to be effective in all sectors of education
from primary through to adult and higher education. Its success has been
growing over the past 10 years and continues to do so.
Teachers working with CLIL are specialists in their own discipline
rather than traditional language teachers. They are usually fluent speakers of
the target language, bilingual or native speakers. In many institutions
language teachers work in partnership with other departments to offer CLIL in
various subjects. The key issue is that the learner is gaining new knowledge
about the 'non-language' subject while encountering, using and learning the
foreign language. The methodologies and approaches used are often linked to the
subject area with the content leading the activities.
CLIL's multi-faceted approach can offer a variety of benefits. It:
- builds intercultural knowledge and understanding
- develops intercultural communication skills
- improves language competence and oral communication skills
- develops multilingual interests and attitudes
- provides opportunities to study content through different perspectives
- allows learners more contact with the target language
- does not require extra teaching hours
- complements other subjects rather than competes with them
- diversifies methods and forms of classroom practice
- increases learners' motivation and confidence in both the language and the subject being taught
Owing to its effectiveness and ability to motivate learners, CLIL is
identified as a priority area in the Action plan for Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity
(Section 1 1.2). The European Symposium on "The Changing European
Classroom - the Potential of Plurilingual Education," held in March 2005
in cooperation with the Luxemburg Presidency recalled the need to ensure that
pupils and students receive CLIL provision at different levels of school
education. It was also emphasised that teachers should receive special training
in CLIL.That same year, the EU published an in-depth study into how CLIL is taking place in
schools throughout Europe. The EU has also
supported many CLIL projects including the development of a
European network for Content and Language Integrated Classrooms, EuroCLIC.
The EuroCLIC
network provides opportunities for contacting and learning from experienced
CLIL practitioners. It produces regular bulletins and has a materials bank, a
calendar of events and a discussion forum for language teachers and assistants
on its website.
The Lifelong
Learning Programme offers opportunities and grants to help schools and
teachers set up and take part in international CLIL projects.
B. Behaviorism
Summary: Behaviorism is a worldview that operates on a principle of
“stimulus-response.” All behavior caused by external stimuli (operant
conditioning). All behavior can be explained without the need to consider
internal mental states or consciousness.
Originators and important contributors: John B. Watson, Ivan Pavlov,
B.F. Skinner, E. L. Thorndike (connectionism), Bandura, Tolman (moving toward
cognitivism)
Keywords: Classical conditioning (Pavlov), Operant conditioning
(Skinner), Stimulus-response (S-R)
Behaviorism is a worldview that assumes a learner is essentially
passive, responding to environmental stimuli. The learner starts off as a clean
slate (i.e. tabula rasa) and behavior is shaped through positive
reinforcement or negative reinforcement. Both positive reinforcement and
negative reinforcement increase the probability that the antecedent behavior
will happen again. In contrast, punishment (both positive and
negative) decreases the likelihood that the antecedent behavior will happen
again. Positive indicates the application of a stimulus; Negative indicates the
withholding of a stimulus. Learning is therefore defined as a change in
behavior in the learner. Lots of (early) behaviorist work was done with animals
(e.g. Pavlov’s dogs) and generalized to humans.
Behaviorism precedes the cognitivist worldview. It rejects
structuralism and is an extension of Logical Positivism.
C. Cognitivism
Summary: The cognitivist paradigm essentially argues that the “black
box” of the mind should be opened and understood. The learner is viewed as an
information processor (like a computer).
Originators and important contributors: Merrill -Component Display
Theory (CDT), Reigeluth (Elaboration Theory), Gagne, Briggs, Wager, Bruner
(moving toward cognitive constructivism), Schank (scripts), Scandura
(structural learning)
Keywords: Schema, schemata, information processing, symbol
manipulation, information mapping, mental models.
The cognitivist revolution replaced behaviorism in 1960s as the
dominant paradigm. Cognitivism focuses on the inner mental activities – opening
the “black box” of the human mind is valuable and necessary for understanding
how people learn. Mental processes such as thinking, memory, knowing, and
problem-solving need to be explored. Knowledge can be seen as schema or
symbolic mental constructions. Learning is defined as change in a learner’s
schemata.
A response to behaviorism, people are not “programmed animals” that
merely respond to environmental stimuli; people are rational beings that
require active participation in order to learn, and whose actions are a
consequence of thinking. Changes in behavior are observed, but only as an
indication of what is occurring in the learner’s head. Cognitivism uses the
metaphor of the mind as computer: information comes in, is being processed, and
leads to certain outcomes.
A reaction to didactic approaches such as behaviorism and programmed
instruction, constructivism states that learning is an active, contextualized
process of constructing knowledge rather than acquiring it. Knowledge is
constructed based on personal experiences and hypotheses of the environment.
Learners continuously test these hypotheses through social negotiation. Each
person has a different interpretation and construction of knowledge process.
The learner is not a blank slate (tabula rasa) but brings past
experiences and cultural factors to a situation.
NOTE: A common misunderstanding regarding constructivism is that
instructors should never tell students anything directly but, instead, should
always allow them to construct knowledge for themselves. This is actually
confusing a theory of pedagogy (teaching) with a theory of knowing.
Constructivism assumes that all knowledge is constructed from the learner’s
previous knowledge, regardless of how one is taught. Thus, even listening to a
lecture involves active attempts to construct new knowledge.
Vygotsky’s
social development theory is one of the
foundations for constructivism
Developed by BF Skinner, Radical Behaviorism describes a
particular school that emerged during the reign of behaviorism. It
is distinct from other schools of behaviorism, with major differences
in the acceptance of mediating structures, the role of emotions, etc.
D. Constructivism
Bartlett (1932) pioneered what became the constructivist
approach (Good & Brophy, 1990). Constructivists believe that "learners
construct their own reality or at least interpret it based upon their
perceptions of experiences, so an individual's knowledge is a function of one's
prior experiences, mental structures, and beliefs that are used to interpret
objects and events." "What someone knows is grounded in perception of
the physical and social experiences which are comprehended by the mind."
(Jonasson, 1991).
If each person has their own view about reality,
then how can we as a society communicate and/or coexist? Jonassen, addressing
this issue in his article Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist
Design Model, makes the following comments:
- "Perhaps the most common misconception of constructivism is the inference that we each therefore construct a unique reality, that reality is only in the mind of the knower, which will doubtlessly lead to intellectual anarchy."
- "A reasonable response to that criticism is the Gibsonian perspective that contends that there exists a physical world that is subject to physical laws that we all know in pretty much the same way because those physical laws are perceivable by humans in pretty much the same way."
- "Constructivists also believe that much of reality is shared through a process of social negotiation..."
If one searches through the many philosophical
and psychological theories of the past, the threads of constructivism may be
found in the writing of such people as Bruner, Ulrick, Neiser, Goodman, Kant,
Kuhn, Dewey and Habermas. The most profound influence was Jean Piaget's work
which was interpreted and extended by von Glasserfield (Smorgansbord, 1997).
E.
Humanism
Humanism, a paradigm that emerged in the 1960s, focuses on the human
freedom, dignity, and potential. A central assumption of humanism, according to
Huitt (2001), is that people act with intentionality and values. This is in
contrast to the behaviorist notion of operant conditioning (which argues that
all behavior is the result of the application of consequences) and the cognitive
psychologist belief that the discovering knowledge or constructing meaning is
central to learning. Humanists also believe that it is necessary to study the
person as a whole, especially as an individual grows and develops over the
lifespan. It follows that the study of the self, motivation, and goals are
areas of particular interest.
Key proponents of humanism include Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. A
primary purpose of humanism could be described as the development of
self-actualized, automomous people. In humanism, learning is student centered
and personalized, and the educator’s role is that of a facilitator. Affective
and cognitive needs are key, and the goal is to develop self-actualized people
in a cooperative, supportive environment.
Related theories include: Experiential Learning
(Kolb), Maslow’s
Hierarchy of Needs, and Facilitation Theory (Rogers).
For more
information, see:
- DeCarvalho, R. (1991). The humanistic paradigm in education. The Humanistic Psychologist, 19(1), 88-104.
- http://www.learning-theories.com/category/behaviorist-theories.
- http://www.learning-theories.com/cognitivism.html.
- Huitt, W. (2001). Humanism and open education. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved September 11, 2007, from the URL: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/affsys/humed.html.
- Merrill, M. D. (1991). Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, May, 45-53.
- Rogers, C., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan.
.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar